
Dominik —
The True Story
Dominik's passing was as dramatic an event as the past
two years of his short life. The fight between an outmoded and
inhuman form of treatment – chemotherapy – and the breakthrough
of a treatment with no side effects – Cellular Medicine – accompanied
Dominik to his death.
It is now clear that Dominik did not die as a result
of his cancer and metastasis of the lung, but rather as a result
of a succession of medical errors made by doctors, resulting in the
formation of a giant haematoma which filled the entire left side
of his chest and began exerting ever more pressure on his heart and
lungs. In addition to this, he developed a pericardial effusion (a
build-up of fluid in the heart), which had an increasingly adverse
effect on cardiac function.
Although an operation was carried out on 25 October
2004 to puncture the left chest cavity, which clearly relieved the
situation, the vital organs (the heart in particular) were already
so badly impaired that Dominik's heart stopped on 1 November.
Dominik was a fighter and held on for a long
time. It wasn't the cancer that eventually defeated him; he was
the victim of an antiquated medical system – one that wanted to
exploit him to prove that cancer continues to be a death sentence.
They did not succeed however!
Chronology of Events
Dominik has become a symbol for humanity's liberation from the scourge
of cancer. The last few years of his life were a long and hard fight,
through which a great many of us accompanied him. We have once again
listed the different stages of this fight below:
9/2002:
At the children's clinic in Siegen, Germany, Dominik is diagnosed with
a form of bone cancer (osteosarcoma) in his right thigh (near the knee).
Chemotherapy starts immediately. After the second cycle of chemo, the
cancer in the thigh bone grew at an alarming rate, as did the lung metastases.
Doctors at Siegen clinic transfer Dominik to the children's ward of the
university clinic in Münster, Germany (director: Professor Jürgens).
The course of chemotherapy continues here, but at no point are Dominik's
parents consulted.
10/2002
Once the parents hear what the doctors in Münster are doing, they contact
the university clinic in Mainz and ask them for a second opinion on Dominik's
illness. On arrival in Mainz his parents are told: “Don't expect us to give
a different recommendation from Münster university clinic.” It is clear
that the Mainz and Münster university clinics have already been in touch
with one another about this.
02/2003
At Münster Castle, the main building of Münster University,
Dr. Rath gives a speech about Cellular Medicine's breakthrough in treating
cancer.
The main hall and its foyer are filled with over eight hundred cancer
patients and their families. Following this speech, many in the audience
start to follow a Cellular Medicine regime.
In the months following this, increasing numbers of people come to hospitals
in the Münster area, having successfully fought or even defeated
their cancer with the help of Cellular Medicine. Pressure increases on
Münster university clinic as the centre of ‘chemo'-orientated cancer
treatment in Germany. This pressure is focused primarily on Professor
Jürgens, dean of the university clinic and a spokesperson for pressure
groups which openly propound chemotherapy.
At this point, Dr. Rath and the Feld family have not yet met.
During this same month, Dominik's parents decide to have the tumour
removed from Dominik's thigh in an operation to save Dominik's leg. They
have to ask Munich university clinic to do this because the clinic in
Münster insists that the whole leg has to be amputated.
05/2003
Due to its severe side effects, Dominik's parents cut short the course of chemotherapy
at Münster university clinic after 14 treatment cycles; at this point their
son weighs only 16 kilos and is fighting for his life. The CT scans of his lungs
show multiple metastases in the lungs, which have actually increased in number
as a result of chemotherapy. Münster university clinic puts pressure on
the Feld family to continue the chemotherapy and also to allow an incredibly
dangerous operation on Dominik's lung to remove the metastases.
Dominik's parents look into alternative means of treatment and come across Cellular
Medicine. They decide to start Dominik on a natural course of therapy. At this
point, Dr. Rath is still unaware of Dominik's plight.
09/01/2003
After four months of Cellular Medicine, Dominik has recovered to such an extent
that he is able to return to school after his year-long absence. He is an excellent
pupil and soon catches up on everything he missed.
09/23/2003
The CT scan taken at his check-up shows that the metastases in his lung have
diminished greatly and even partially disappeared following his exclusive adherence
to a Cellular Medicine regime. Münster university clinic is notified of
the impressive success that this alternative natural course of therapy has achieved
with Dominik.
09/28/2003
Professor Jürgens files a lawsuit with Betzdorf district court, aiming
to deprive Dominik's parents of their right of care for him, thus enabling him
to compel Dominik to undergo chemotherapy, against their will. He also wanted
to perform an operation on Dominik's lungs to remove alleged metastases, despite
the fact that the CT scan taken on 23 September showed that, following his optimum
intake of cellular nutrients, there were hardly any metastases left. This amounts
to forcing an almost healthy child to subject himself, under duress, to a toxic ‘cure'
with almost no chance of survival (70 to 90% likelihood of causing death).
This begs the question: Why, in the face of the proven remission
of the metastases in Dominik's lungs, was Professor Jürgens unable
to share in the pleasure at Dominik's imminent recovery and to congratulate
Dominik's parents?
Professor Jürgen's actions show that he was not concerned exclusively
with Dominik's health. There were obviously other elements at work. It
seems that the real aim in forcing chemotherapy on the child was to support
the pretence that Dominik's death was inevitable, sidelining Dr. Rath and
eliminating Cellular Medicine as a viable alternative to ineffectual chemotherapy.
Criminal proceedings citing bodily harm, manslaughter and other allegations
would then have been instituted against Dr. Rath under the pretext that
Cellular Medicine was to blame for the fact that Dominik failed to receive
successful treatment in time - a complete reversal of the actual facts
of the case.
11/2003
Betzdorf district court makes its staggering decision to withdraw from Dominik's
parents the parental right of care for their child. Dominik's parents contact
a number of German publications (including Bild newspaper and Fokus magazine)
to let the public know what is happening to their child. However, the media
shows no interest in reporting the story.
Finally, Dominik's parents contact Dr. Rath to ask for help. Dr. Rath informs
them that he can only help if they are willing to make their child's story
known to as many people as possible. The Dr. Rath Foundation, together
with the ‘Save Dominik' association recently initiated by Dominik's parents,
tell the people of Germany what Dominik has been through via publications,
the internet and in speeches.
01/09/2004

CT scan of Dominik's lung, taken on 9 January 2004. In this
and all subsequent images, the view of the pleural space
is taken from below. The left lung is therefore on the right
of the picture.
>> Click on the image for an enlarged view |
|
Another CT scan of Dominik's lungs confirms that there are still no metastases
in his lungs.
02/2004
Dominik's parents set up the ‘Save Dominik' association and receive support
from the people of Germany and far beyond.
03/2004
Professor Jürgens files charges of bodily harm and attempted manslaughter
against Dr. Rath, whose scientific findings in relation to Cellular Medicine
are putting the billion-dollar chemotherapy market under threat.
03/31/2004
At a session of Koblenz Court of Appeal, the decision by Betzdorf District Court
is overturned. It returns the right of care for Dominik to his parents. Dominik
is so healthy that he greets the judge personally at the start of the hearing.
Public interest in Dominik's fate reaches far beyond Germany.
04/2004
Dominik celebrates his first communion surrounded by his family and in good
health. He even starts playing football again, which had been his favourite
sport before becoming ill, in his favourite position as goalkeeper. For Dominik,
who has just regained his health, this hobby is to prove disastrous.
05/2004
During a game of football, a ball hits Dominik hard in the temple.
This leads to a headache and, a short time later, Dominik requires emergency
surgery on account of a haematoma that has formed in the temple area.
The surgeons at Jung-Stilling hospital in Siegen know that Dominik was
previously diagnosed with bone cancer. Because of their view that this
diagnosis was a sure-fire death sentence, they record that metastases
have formed in Dominik's brain - without the evidence of a corroborating
tissue analysis on which to base this diagnosis. After this operation,
surgeons do not replace a small fragment of Dominik's skull from around
the temple area, so as to enable the swelling from the operative scar
to go down. The intention is to replace this skull fragment a few weeks
later.
07/12/2004
When Dominik's mother arrives for the planned operation, she is informed that
her son is riddled with metastases despite the fact that no examinations have
been carried out to support this. Another CT scan is carried out which shows
the operative scar on Dominik's brain. Without any further examinations being
carried out, Dominik's mother is informed that this operative scar is allegedly
a metastasis. However, his mother becomes suspicious and leaves the clinic with
her son.
Two days later, Dominik's mother receives two phone calls from the duty surgeon
at Siegen hospital informing her, to her surprise, that after having another
look at the CT image, he has discovered that, in the area behind the operative
scar on Dominik's head, an oedema (build-up of excess fluid) has in fact formed.
This only increases Dominik's parents' mistrust of the hospital.
Who influenced the doctors at the clinic? What led them to unsettle
Dominik's mother like this and pressurise her? Why was it so urgently necessary
for Dominik to undergo an operation to remove alleged metastases instead
of the scheduled skull-fragment replacement? How did the alleged metastases
suddenly disappear? In whose interest was this strategy? Was the intention
to force Dominik back into the clutches of pharmaceutical medicine?
At this point, Dominik's parents lose all trust in the doctors treating
their son for they are left with no choice but to believe that the pressure
groups which have been hounding their son for months are bringing their
influence to bear on subordinated hospitals such as Siegen hospital.
07/21/2004
A short time later, since Dominik has still not undergone surgery to replace
the missing skull fragment, the wound on his head becomes inflamed, requiring
him to undergo another operation in Siegen. He suffers a multitude of complications
following this operation.
08/15/2004
After a severe bout of pneumonia, Dominik is admitted to the children's
clinic at Pirmasens hospital (director: Dr. Kläber), suffering from
a pleural effusion (abnormal accumulation of fluid in the pleural space).
08/16/2004
To treat the pleural effusion in Dominik's left lung, the doctors at
Pirmasens hospital perform a pleurocentesis on him. During this procedure
it is clear that they punctured Dominik's left lung, which collapsed
like a deflated balloon. On the left side of Dominik's chest, previously
filled by the left lung, a huge hollow space is created. 2.2 litres of
fluid in total are drained out of this.
08/17/2004
Dominik's condition deteriorates. The doctors at Pirmasens hospital inform Dominik's
mother that Dominik has only hours to live. Hereupon, Dominik's distraught mother
decides to give him the bad news and a priest is asked to come that same evening
to read Dominik his last rites.
While the doctors' attention is focused on his apparent impending death, Dominik
is not given vital medical care. Only when the doctors are threatened with legal
action are they prepared to replenish the albumin that was lost during the drainage
procedure by giving Dominik an albumin infusion.
The next morning, Dominik's breathing is still shallow, but the albumin infusion
has fought off the life-threatening situation. Over the next few days, Dominik's
health stabilises to some degree.
In retrospect, it is evident that the injury to the left lung clearly inflicted
at Pirmasens hospital was a decisive factor in triggering the series of events
that ultimately led to Dominik's demise.
The doctors at Pirmasens must be questioned as to why they
did not follow standard medical monitoring procedures after the pleurocentesis,
which should have led to emergency measures to re-inflate the left
lung.
Why was Dominik left lying in his hospital bed at Pirmasens
hospital for days with only one functioning lung? Why was there no
mention in the doctors' reports of the obviously collapsed lung or
the dramatic medical consequences of this?
Why was Dominik denied vital medical care, such as the albumin
infusion, for such a long time?
08/23/2004
Dominik is transferred to Westerwald German Red Cross clinic in Kirchen, which
is closer to his home town. Chief physician, Dr. Buchal, makes contact with
Professor Jürgens in Münster to discuss the case. Still no medical
care is provided for the obviously collapsed left lung. Throughout the course
of his week-long stay at Kirchen hospital, Dominik develops additional life-threatening
problems, all of which receive insufficient medical attention or, in some cases,
no medical attention at all: Dominik's haemoglobin levels (which measure the
amount of oxygen in red blood cells) fall to below half the normal level. His
plasma levels also fall to a life-threatening level. The boy's shallow breathing,
which is a result of his having to breathe with only one functioning lung, is
interpreted as a sign of his impending death. The parents are told many times
over that their child is on the verge of death.
One of Dominik's parents requests that Dominik be given an optimum dose
of vitamins – a request that is denied by chief physician, Dr. Buchal,
claiming that he cannot allow it on "ethical grounds".
08/27/2004
Dominik begs his parents to rescue him from the clutches of Kirchen hospital,
saying: “If you don't get me out of here, I won't survive the weekend.” Dominik
obviously feels that continuing to stay in this hospital poses a real threat
to him. He could not possibly have known that on this very Friday, the chief
physician at the hospital had applied for an injunction permitting him to force
Dominik to accept morphine for the pain, although Dominik was not suffering
from much pain at all. Even the smallest overdose of morphine can have life-threatening,
if not lethal, consequences.
Did Dr. Buchal want the court's blessing for the action he was
about to take? Had Dr. Buchal also discussed this action with Professor
Jürgens? Why, instead of implementing urgently necessary medical care,
did they simply allow Dominik's life to be put at risk, actually encouraging
his apparently imminent death?
08/30/2004
Dominik's parents push for Dominik to be transferred to a hospital that also
provides naturopathic treatment. Chief physician, Dr. Buchal, refuses to do
this and instead presents the parents with a injunction from Betzdorf district
court, which in effect gives the doctors free rein to administer morphine to
Dominik, who at this point is still free of pain.
Only when the parents' lawyers threaten to go public with information
about Dr. Buchal's actions, which have no medically justifiable grounds,
does Dr. Buchal finally relent – on the evening of that Monday – and allow Dominik
to be transferred to “Villa Medica”, an alternative clinic in Edenkoben,
in the Rhineland-Pfalz region of Germany. The doctors from Kirchen still
tried to give Dominik a morphine injection in the ambulance, with the
supposed aim of helping him survive the journey.
If Dominik's father hadn't stepped in at the last minute to prevent
them doing this, Dominik would probably have succumbed to his fate there
and then. Shortly before midnight, Dominik reaches “Villa Medica”.
09/01/2004
The chief physician at “Villa Medica”, Dr. Burkhard Aschhoff, gives Dominik
a full check-up, finding him to be “in a state of generally diminished health
and restricted breathing”. At 5.8 his haemoglobin level is below half the normal
level and his plasma level is also life-threateningly low. An X-ray of Dominik's
chest cavity, taken the same day, documents the collapsed left lung: “The left
pleural space (space surrounding the lungs) is transparent, giving the impression
of a pneumothorax (collection of air or gas in the pleural space). No lung tissue
is discernible".
According to Dr. Aschhoff, the following measures were taken: “We had to immediately
administer 2 transfusions of erythrocyte concentrate (blood bottles) and substitute
7 infusions of human albumin (plasma protein) to remedy the life-threatening
situation.”
That same day, Dr. Aschoff performs a further pleurocentesis (puncture of the
pleural space) on Dominik: “The puncture needle was inserted dorsally (from
the back) between the 7 th and 8 th rib.” Puncturing the pleural space from
behind is a highly dangerous procedure due to the high risk of lacerating the
blood vessels located here.
It is probable that in performing this risky procedure, Dr. Aschhoff
did in fact lacerate some of the blood vessels inside Dominik's ribcage.
What other explanation could there be for the mass of fluid which began
to fill Dominik's pleural space over the following days and which a specialist
laboratory later found to be blood coagulum (a fibrin precipitate with
red blood cells)?
09/03/2004
Yet another pleurocentesis to insert a chest drain. To suction air from the
pleural space, Dr. Aschoff punctures Dominik's pleural space once more – this
time from the front – and connects a suction pump.
09/06/2004

X-ray CT of Dominik's lung on 6 September 2004. The left lung has collapsed
as a result of medical error. Its cavity is filled with a huge haematoma. In
the centre, a drainage catheter can be seen (see text).
>> Click on the image for an enlarged view |
|
Dr. Aschhoff has an x-ray CT taken of Dominik's whole chest. It now becomes
apparent that the whole of the left side of his chest is suddenly full of a
uniform mass that was not visible on any previous CT scan. Dr. Aschoff and the
examining radiologist interpret the sudden appearance of the structure as “exploding
lung metastases” from Dominik's bone cancer.
Neither doctor, clearly, is bothered
by the fact that the left lung is supposedly full of secondaries, while the
right lung shows no sign whatever of metastases.
Since the lung is a single
organ with evenly distributed blood supply, this cannot be the case.
Dr. Aschoff also informs Dr. Rath of this finding. The latter considers
this diagnosis to be unlikely and premature, and suggests waiting for the
result of the special laboratory test on the contents of the drainage tube
situated in the midst of this mass.
09/08/2004

Analysis of the catheter tip at a special laboratory confirms the haematoma
and at the same time rules out the possibility of a lung metastasis. (German
text, PDF-file)
>> Click
on the image for an enlarged view |
|
The test finding from the special pathology institute is now available.
Test result number E 27088/04 gives the following diagnosis: “Catheter
tip with adjoining fibrin condensate, with no indication of malignancy.” This
is confirmed by the diagnosis of a huge blood clot in Dominik's left
thoracic cavity, and definitely rules out the possibility that the structure
which has suddenly developed can be a tumour metastasis in the lung.
The finding inevitably confirms that the left lung is no longer inflated
at this point. Thus the suspicion of a collapsed lung due to the pleural
puncture on 08/15/2004 is once again confirmed.
09/15/2004
Despite this compelling evidence, Dr. Aschhoff insists to the very end that
his erroneous diagnosis is correct. At this point, Dr. Aschhoff must realise
that he probably contributed to the deterioration of Dominik's condition. In
order to hush this up he publicly discredits Dr. Rath and makes him out to be
completely incompetent.
He goes so far as to enlist the Springer-owned tabloid “Bild”, well-known for
its anti-Rath smear campaign on behalf of the pharmaceutical cartel. He contacts
Bild journalist D. Becker. This is no accident, for Dr. Aschhoff is godfather
to Becker's children. The relationship between Aschhoff and Becker is clearly
so close that Aschhoff – in flagrant violation of doctor-patient confidentiality – even
gives this Bild sensation-monger the CT images which he misdiagnosed. On 12
and 13 November these delude a readership of millions into believing in a non-existent
giant tumour in Dominik's chest. This is one of the reasons why Dominik's parents
have now filed criminal proceedings against Dr. Aschhoff.
Dr. Aschhoff also informs Dominik's distraught parents of his false diagnosis,
claiming that Dominik only has a few days to live. When the parents are rightly
sceptical of this diagnosis, Dr. Aschhoff refuses Dominik any further treatment.
Once again, his parents are compelled to find another clinic, at a moment's
notice, where Dominik's treatment can continue.
Does Dr. Aschhoff really believe that he can cover up his false
diagnosis and his medical misconduct through a campaign of intentional
public misinformation? Was he perhaps trying to avoid an enquiry into his
grave medical errors by intentionally violating doctor-patient confidentiality
and publishing misdiagnosed CT images of Dominik?
However grave Dr. Aschhoff's medical misconduct was, the harm he
caused by allowing himself to be exploited by the pharmaceuticals' flagship
tabloid “Bild” is far more serious. The medical misinformation and lies
thus spread about the Dominik case are depriving millions of cancer patients
of the chance to turn their backs on the “toxic cures” of chemotherapy,
and to combat their cancer with the help of scientifically based effective
natural remedies.
The fact that the Bild tabloid is a rabble-rouser
for the pharmaceutical cartel is no accident. The chairman of the supervisory
board of the Springer group (Bild, Bild am Sonntag etc.) is Sicilian Giuseppe
Vita, who is also chair of the supervisory board of the pharmaceutical
group ‘Schering'.
And it gets worse: The executive chairman of the Axel-Springer publishing
company, Mathias Döpfner, is also on the supervisory board of Schering
AG. The Schering group alone makes an annual turnover of almost half a
billion dollars from cancer drugs, a market which they are clearly trying
to defend with all means at their disposal, such as the smear campaign
against Dr. Rath.
09/16/2004
Fleeing their pursuers, who in the meantime have clearly enlisted every clinic
in Germany, the parents decide to take the only step possible and look abroad
to receive further treatment for their child. Eventually, they find a clinic
that provides both traditional and alternative forms of treatment, and is willing
to admit Dominik: the “Oasis of Hope” clinic in Mexico, directly bordering the
US. Many North American patients, who have been failed by chemo-medicine, also
go there for treatment.
09/17/2004
Dominik, his mother and a supervisory doctor flee the witch-hunt in Germany
and fly to North America. Shortly before landing, the horrified parents hear
that their pursuers have still not given up. They have forced through emergency
legal proceedings at Betzdorf district court on the coming Monday, with the
aim of obtaining a court order to drive Dominik, once and for all, back into
the power of pharmaceutical medicine.
09/20/2004
The judge at Betzdorf district court is informed by the parents' solicitor of
Dominik's new place of abode and the comprehensive range of treatments which
the clinic offers. The judge decides in favour of Dominik and his parents, as
he realises that Dominik does not need further suffering inflicted on him in
the name of therapy, and that the clinic is providing for his needs in the best
possible way. For his own personal assurance, he himself phones Dominik the
next day at the “Oasis” clinic, and wishes him the best of luck.
For the pursuers who believed, after Dominik had been refused further treatment
at “Villa Medica”, that they had cornered him and his parents, this is a decisive
defeat. To hush up this final escape by Dominik from the clutches of the pharmaceutical
interest groups and their seventh consecutive legal defeat, they start a real
media rampage against Cellular Medicine and Dr. Rath – using everything from
the “Bild” newspaper to ZDF and ARD broadcasting stations.
Throughout the whole of Germany there is not a single clinic that
does not participate in the campaign against Dominik. What is the meaning
of this? Not one clinic is willing to offer him potentially life-saving
treatment.
Do umpteen thousand cancer patients in Germany have to pay the
price for the fact that this country was the stronghold of the pharmaceutical
cartel for years, and enslaved whole areas of society such as medicine
and the media?
Following his flagrant mistreatment in German hospitals and the long journey,
Dominik is in a greatly weakened condition. As before, he still breathes with
only one lung - which is also constricted due to the huge haematoma in the left
lung. Dominik's heart is also constricted and gradually develops a pericardial
effusion (a build-up of fluid in the space between the heart and the sac around
the heart). This pericardial effusion increasingly impairs the heart function,
that is, the capacity of the heart to pump blood.
Due to his generally weak condition, and the false information which clinics
in Germany have given about Dominik's previous case history, the doctors
at the “Oasis” clinic decide not to operate but to keep him under careful
observation.
10/08/2004
Another CT check-up of Dominik's chest is undertaken. It shows an astonishing
finding: in the midst of the light-grey mass in Dominik's left chest cavity
can be seen a large, dark-grey area which the doctors initially misdiagnose
as tumour necrosis (dead tumour tissue). A chest-cavity puncture is considered,
but in the end is not carried out due to Dominik's generally weak condition.
10/25/2004
Due to his restricted lung and heart function, Dominik's condition deteriorates
further. He suffers from increasingly irregular heartbeat (arrhythmia), a racing
heart (tachycardia) and high blood pressure as a consequence of the increasing
constriction of his heart. His death now seems likely. Since there is no alternative,
the parents urge the clinic's doctors to puncture the dark-grey mass in Dominik's
chest.
The aim is to ease pressure on the vital organs, the heart and the right lung.
The doctors say they are willing to do this - a highly dramatic decision, for
if the lump in Dominik's chest is really a huge metastasis of the left lung,
a lung puncture could cause the whole left lung to collapse like a deflated
balloon. Due to the already much reduced respiratory function, this would very
probably lead to immediate death. This intervention will endanger Dominik's
life unless the mass in Dominik's left chest is not a metastasis of the left
lung, but a haematoma that has formed outside the previously collapsed left
lung.
The surgical procedure is undertaken at 8 pm under local anaesthetic. The surgeon's
needle enters Dominik's chest cavity without encountering lung tissue. Dominik's
heart and respiratory function remain unaltered. This confirms the grave suspicion
that the left lung was deflated by the puncture at Pirmasens Hospital in August,
leading to Dominik having to breathe with only one lung ever since.
The surgeon subsequently introduced a drainage tube (catheter) into Dominik's
left chest cavity, positioning its tip exactly in the middle of the huge lump
with the help of the x-ray CT. The fluid voided through this drainage tube over
the following days was tested in a special laboratory. The diagnosis was clear:
“No evidence of malignancy”. Confirming the test result on 8 September, the
mass in Dominik's chest was thus once again identified as coagulated blood,
and metastasis was ruled out.
In the following days, almost half a litre of fluid was drained from the
dissolving haematoma. This eased the pressure somewhat in Dominik's chest,
visible also from the x-ray images. However, the haematoma in the heart
sac (pericardial effusion) was not reduced and, after a week, this finally
led to the pump function of Dominik's heart failing.
11/01/2004
Dominik dies. He was not the victim of his cancer but died from the consequences
of severe medical errors in German hospitals. He was the victim of a form of
medicine that stops at nothing to prove that cancer remains a death sentence.
11/08/2004
Dominik's body is brought back to Germany. When the boy's coffin arrived at
Frankfurt airport, Koblenz public prosecutor department immediately confiscated
it. Why? Münster professor Jürgens had issued a charge against Dr.
Rath for bodily harm and manslaughter, which the public prosecutor department
was processing. Furthermore, the parents were informed that a charge had also
been filed against them for failure to provide due help.
11/09/2004
A post-mortem is carried out on Dominik at Mainz University clinic's pathology
institute. Legal representatives acting for the parents, and those acting for
Dr. Rath were not admitted. The parents do not doubt the independence of Koblenz
public prosecutor department, but there are justified concens, due to links
between the university clinics at Mainz and Münster, about the objectivity
of the Mainz pathologists. For this reason the parents decide to have a second
post-mortem carried out. This turns out to be a very wise decision.
11/10/2004
At the second post-mortem, independent doctors and legal experts were present
with the pathologists. The decisive findings of this autopsy were the following:
The “Corpus delicti“ – the left lung which suffered collapse due to medical
errors, and the haematoma which developed in the resulting cavity – were, astonishingly,
no longer present! Clearly these important findings had been removed by the
Mainz pathologists and – contrary to all rules of court pathology – not replaced
again in the corpse.
One has to ask why. Did the pathologists do this in order to investigate
the truth or to conceal it? Why were Dominik and his parents denied the
right to full burial – that is, with all organs intact?
Koblenz public prosecutor department has already been informed
of the absence of the left lung and the huge blood coagulation in the left
thoracic cavity, with a request to ensure that this organ and its findings
are not ‘accidentally' discarded by the Mainz pathologists.
The second post-mortem however, has already closed the door on any attempt to
manipulate Dominik's cause of death. The whole right lung was present, and one
could see at first glance that this organ contained no metastases. If there
were any secondaries at all in this organ, they were so small that they could
not have posed a threat to his life.
Since the right and left lungs compose a single organ, and are nourished by
the same blood supply, it is impossible for the right lung to have been free
of metastases while the left lung was one huge metastasis.
So while the second post-mortem was able to rule out lung metastasis as cause
of death, the lung tissue gave clear indications of the actual cause of death:
so-called lung congestion (accumulation of fluid in the lung tissue), an unmistakeable
sign of blockage in the lung's blood circulation. This, in turn, is an expression
of the fact that the heart's pump function was restricted, which ultimately
led to heart failure.
The second expert report on the right lung renders any attempt
to manipulate Dominik's cause of death a useless undertaking.
11/14/2004
It becomes clear from a report in “Bild am Sonntag” that the parents'
fear of attempts at such manipulation are not unfounded. Today, this
pharmaceutical flagship's invidious campaign is notched up still further,
when it reports on supposed “first results of the post-mortem ordered
by Koblenz public prosecutor department”: “According to information available
to BamS, Dominik's small body was wasted with cancer. The lungs were
riddled with metastases.” In view of the available facts one cannot imagine
a greater affront to the truth.
In summary, the following questions arise:
Is an alliance between pharmaceutical doctors and pharmaceutical-dependent
media trying to falsify the cause of Dominik's death?
Do these false findings aim to manipulate the public prosecutor
department and the public?
Is all this happening to bring criminal proceedings against
Dr. Rath, innovator of an effective, side-effect free alternative to
the billion dollar business with useless chemotherapies and the perpetuation
of cancer?
Is the aim to discredit the natural therapy of Cellular Medicine
and bury its threat to the pharmaceutical investment business?
Should this unscrupulous conduct get away with sacrificing millions
of cancer patients to an illness which could long ago have been assigned
to the past?
It is already clear that the Dominik case is introducing
a new era in medicine which no longer serves the financial interests of
a handful of pharmaceutical shareholders but the health interests of millions
of people. |